“SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW:

https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-7/#comment-743

1) The Purpose of Government: “We the People” “ordain and establish” “the supreme Law of the Land” “in order to …establish Justice… and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”(a), in other words “to protect and maintain individual rights.”(d). So to punish “We the People” just for “disobeying” orders or legislation from our hired “Public Servants” is exactly the opposite of the very Purpose of Law and Govt., and technically that’s “Treason to the Constitution”(b)(c)!
See: (a) US.Constitution, (b) US.Supreme.Court., Cohens-v-Virginia, (c) USC-18-2381 (d) Az.Const. ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-86

2) List of ‘self-evident’ basic Human Rights: We hold these Truths to be self-Evidence that all Humans are endowed by their Creator with equal inalienable rights including Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness(a), to own Land and other Property, to Privacy from search and seizure without probable cause to accuse one of a crime against another Human right(b), to any common practice, to fair exchanges like payment for labor, to free travel on public roads for common personal needs, and to free speech and Liberty in general(c).
See: (a) Decl.of.Ind., (b) US.Constitution, (c) US.Supr.Ct. “precedents” ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-89

3) “Probable cause”: For all “searches and seizures” and “criminal prosecutions” to be “lawful” there must be “probable” evidence(a) of an actual “crime” against another Human beings equal rights(b), to a “reasonable and prudent”(b) person who thinks critically and checks facts, caused by “intent or inexcusable neglect” of the accused(b), and in violation of valid criminal “Law of the Land”(a).
See: (a) US.Constitution, (b) US.Supr.Ct. “precedents” ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-87

4) Three Elements to a Crime: A “crime” requires actual or “probable”(a) harm or threat to another Human Beings equal individual natural rights aka “Corpus Delicti”, caused by “Intent or inexcusable neglect” of the accused suspect aka “Mens Rea”, and in violation of valid Criminal “Law of the Land” aka “Actus Reus”(b).
See: (a) US.Constitution, (b) US.Supreme.Court. “precedents” ; & links to these and more here:
US.Const.,US.Supr.Ct.; https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-88

5) “fundamental principles” of “Law”, such as, “essential elements of due process of law”: “The essential elements of due process of law are notice and opportunity to defend, and in determining whether such rights are denied, the Court is governed by the substance of things, and not by mere form.” See: (a) US.Supr.Ct., Simon v. Craft, 182 U.S. 427 (1901) ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-93
How best to describe “fundamental principles” of “Law”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-83
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6) “Deprivation of rights under color of law”, “Colorable Law” (See USCs BELOW ALSO): “any Thing… to the Contrary” of The Constitution for the United States of America and “Laws made in Pursuance thereof”(a) is “unconstitutional” and therefore not “lawful” but is called “colorable law” or “color of law”(b), and “deprivation of rights under color of law” to even “neglect to prevent”(b)!
See: (a) US.Const. ; (b) USCs 18-241&242 &42-1983,1985,1986,1988 ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-91

7) Public Servants’ Oath(s), and resulting lack of “immunity”: “the supreme Law of the Land” requires in article 6 that Members of the Legislative, Judicial and Executive Branches of Federal and State Governments “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution” and only those “Laws made in Pursuance thereof”(a). Accordingly any person who causes any person to be deprived of any right under the color of any law or order shall be liable to that party, including actions for “neglect to prevent”(b).
See: (a) US.Const. ; (b) USCs 18-241&242 &42-1983,1985,1986,1988 ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-92

8) We are ‘sovereign’, not ‘subject’ to Law/Statutes/Etc. without Consent or Injured Party: “…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects… and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”(a)
See: (a) US.Supr.Ct., Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793) ; Decl.of.Ind. ; & links to these and more here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-104

9) Parental Rights: Include choosing pretty much everything for their children so long as there is not “probable” evidence of actual harm to the childrens equal Human rights to Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness, good health and education, and so forth.:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-115

10) Right to privacy: Due to the right to privacy “We the People”(a) need only “state… true full name”(b) for police when there is “probable”(c) evidence to accuse us of an actual “crime”(d) against another Human beings equal “individual rights”(e), or we can just reserve “the right to remain silent”(f).
See: (a) US.Const., Preamble, Amend.4,6,14 ; (b) ARS 13-2412, US.Supr.Ct. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004) ; (c) US.Const.Amend.4, US.Supr.Ct. on “probable cause” ; (d) See #4 “elements to a crime” ; (e) Az.Const.Art.2,Sec.2 ; (f) US.Supr.Ct. Miranda v. Arizona ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-90

11) Right to Free Travel on Public Roads “in the conveyance of the day”: ‘Held… The right to travel is a part of the “liberty” of which a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. …as early as the Magna Carta.’(a) ; “…[T]he right finds no explicit mention in the Constitution…. freedom to travel throughout the United States has long been recognized as a basic right under the Constitution.”(b) ; ‘The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways… is a common right…to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day…to operate an automobile thereon… It is not a mere privilege, like… moving a house… or transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which a city may permit or prohibit at will.’(c) ;
See: (a) US.Supr.Ct., Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958) ; (b) US.Supr.Ct., Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) ; (c) Supreme Court of Virginia, THOMPSON v. SMITH, Sep 11 (1930) ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-101

12) Right to own Land and other Property: The US Constitution (And US Supreme Court) effectively declares basic rights for all Humans equally including the right to own land and other property: “No person shall …be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”(a) ; “… No State shall make or enforce any law which shall … deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” ;
…NEED SOURCES FOR THIS… See: (a) US.Const.,Amend.5 ; (b) US.Const.,Amend.14 ; US.Supr.Ct.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-98

13) Right to any ‘Common Practice’:
US.Supr.Ct. has said clearly any “common practice” is an inherent natural Human “right” ;
…NEED SOURCES FOR THIS… See: US.Const.,Amend.4,5,14 ; US.Supr.Ct.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-99

14) Right to ‘fair exchanges’, only ‘profits or gains’ can be ‘taxes’ called ‘income’: “Fair Exchanges” like compensation for labor, are a Natural Common Human right, and therefore not “lawful” to “license” or “tax” or “infringe” in any way. “Income” can mean only “profit or gain” for purposes of “income tax” under the 16th Amendment.
…NEED SOURCES FOR THIS… See: US.Const.,Amend.4,5,14 ; US.Supr.Ct. ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-100

15) Right “to solicit for donations for ones self” (‘Panhandle’) is a right of free speech:
See comment here: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-102

16) An unrebutted affidavit stands as a fact in a court of law:
See: US.Appeals.Ct., Data Disc, Inc, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977) ; Also US.Civil Court Procedure Rule 8(b)(6): “Effect of Failing to Deny… An allegation…is admitted…” ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-107

17) Motions are deemed filed when handed to the Officer:
…NEED SOURCES FOR THIS… US.Supr.Ct.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-105

18) Void for Vagueness Doctrine:
…NEED SOURCES FOR THIS… US.Supr.Ct.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-95

19) “Jurisdiction”, requirements, limits: For a Court of Law to have proper “Jurisdiction” there are three “Elements” required, starting with “Territorial Jurisdiction” meaning the location where the incident occurred which determines which court should hear the case, according to the “Subject Matter” such as Criminal or Civil cases which determines the specific Court(s) which have proper “Jurisdiction”, and finally “Persona Jurisdiction” meaning the individuals or agencies which are parties to the case which also affect which Courts are appropriate to hear the case.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-94

20) ‘Justice’: “The constant and perpetual disposition to render every man his due. I… The conformity of our actions and our will to the law… In the most extensive sense of the word it differs little from “virtue;” for it includes within itself the whole circle of virtues. …” – thelawdictionary.org/justice-n/ ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-96

21) ‘State’: “A body politic, or society of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage, by the joint efforts of their combined strength. Cooley, Const. Lim. 1. One of the component commonwealths or states of the United States of America. The people of a state, in their collective capacity, considered as the party wronged by a criminal deed; the public; as in the title of a cause. “The State vs. A. B.” The section of territory occupied by one of the United States.” – thelawdictionary.org/state-n/ ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-103

22) “Lawful” “Money”: Only Gold and Silver Coin made according to Constitutional “Coinage Acts” can be “Lawful” “Money” in these United States of America, because “No State shall … make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;…” US.Const.Art.1,Sec.10.;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-109

23) “Trespass…means…except…when premises are open to the public”, [ARS 13-1501, 13-1502] (See also Numbers 2-6): See ARS 13-1501, 13-1502] (See also Numbers 2-6):
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/01501.htm ; https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/01502.htm ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-106

24) Names of all Govt. units and Humans must be “Proper Nouns” (only 1st Letters capitalized) by “Law”: See Standard English Rules of Capitalization, required by US.Govt.Printing.Manual;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-108

25) All govt., cities, states, police, courts, etc., are ‘corporations’ registered on Dunn and Bradstreet (dnb.com): NEED SOURCES FOR THIS…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-110

26) Our Constitutional republic was lost in 1861, when the 1st State seceded: NEED SOURCES FOR THIS…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-111

27) “private attorney general doctrine”: NEED SOURCES FOR THIS…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-114

28) INFO ON PERFORMING WRITS OF MANDAMUS: NEED SOURCES FOR THIS…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-57

29) INFO REGARDING HOW TO PERFORM COMMERCIAL LIENS: NEED SOURCES FOR THIS…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-58

30) RIGHT TO RELEASE FROM JAIL PENDING CRIMINAL CONVICTION: See Arizona Constitution and Criminal Procedure for one example, the Right to release exists unless there is “probable” evidence one is a danger to another person or the public, and the only purpose of bail in criminal procedure is to assure appearance in court, therefore we have a right to be released “On Own Recognizance” if there is not such evidence against us.; https://www.azleg.gov/constitution/ ; https://casetext.com/rule/arizona-court-rules/arizona-rules-of-criminal-procedure ;
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-138

31) Re: Defamation: ARS 23-1325. Defamation; damages: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/23/01325.htm
Also see ‘Slander’ and ‘Libel’ (Spoken and written slander)…
12-541. Malicious prosecution; false imprisonment; libel or slander; seduction or breach of promise of marriage; breach of employment contract; wrongful termination; liability created by statute; one year limitation: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00541.htm
12-651. Uniform single publication act: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/12/00651.htm

In Arizona, the elements of a defamation claim are:

a false statement concerning the plaintiff;
the statement was defamatory;
the statement was published to a third party;
the requisite fault on the part of the defendant; and
the plaintiff was damaged as a result of the statement.

Morris v. Warner, 160 Ariz. 55, 62 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988): https://casetext.com/case/morris-v-warner-1

To be “defamatory,” a statement must be false and bring the defamed person into disrepute, contempt, or ridicule, or impeach her honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation. Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 162 Ariz. 335, 341 (Ariz. 1989): http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/arizona-defamation-law
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914c06cadd7b049347b3afa
https://casetext.com/case/godbehere-v-phoenix-newspapers-inc-1

Defamation in US Codes (If you are not in Az): “The term “defamation” means any action or other proceeding for defamation, libel, slander, or similar claim alleging that forms of speech are false, have caused damage to reputation or emotional distress, have presented any person in a false light, or have resulted in criticism, dishonor, or condemnation of any person.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/4101

32) “EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES”, TO JUSTIFY “SEARCHES AND SEIZURES” WITHOUT A “WARRANT”: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-64

33) “Logical Fallacies” and how to spot them, avoid making them, and correct them when found: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-3/#comment-505

34) Not providing ‘trail by an impartial jury’ and ‘Assistance of Counsel’ as required by the 6th Amendment ‘In all criminal prosecutions’!: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-71

35) Re: STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS, limits, exceptions: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-72

36) Re: STOP AND IDENTIFY STATUTES AND US.SUPR.CT. ‘CASE LAW’: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-74

37) “Re: IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-75

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF WORDS:

(And I suggest getting legal definitions from any specific laws relevant to a specific case first, or from higher courts or laws if they contradict and overrule the lower laws definitions, or from www.thelawdictionary.org which is Blacks Law and I think the most up to date and accurate source. But I use www.law.cornell.edu for US Codes like those below, with some definitions in them for examples…)

1) Define “Misprision” (as in “misprision of felony”):
“… noun law Criminal neglect of duty or wrongful execution of official duties.”
https://www.wordnik.com/words/misprision ;
“a: neglect or wrong performance of official duty”
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misprision

Also see:
From: LII, U.S. Code, Title 18. CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, Part I. CRIMES, Chapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS…
18 U.S. Code § 4 – Misprision of felony
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2382

2) Define “probable”:
“likely to be true or likely to happen:”
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/probable
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/probable
“2 having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt.”
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/probable

3) Define “reasonable”:
“Just, rational, appropriate, ordinary, or usual in the circumstances. … In the law of negligence, for example, the reasonable person standard is the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would observe under a given set of circumstances. An individual who subscribes to such standards can avoid liability for negligence.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/reasonable

4) “conjecture”:
“inference formed without proof or sufficient evidence”.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conjecture

5) Defamation: See Ref.#31).

6) “EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES”: See Ref.#32).
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-64

7) “Logical Fallacies”: See Ref.#33).
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-3/#comment-505

8) WHAT IS ‘THE COMMON LAW’?: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-76

9) “Original jurisdiction: https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-3/#comment-406

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MORE COURT CASES, QUOTES AND URLs TO SOURCES:

A) CONSTITUTIONS, US AND STATES:
1) US Constitution: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript ; https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript ; https://usconstitution.net/const.html
2) Az. Const.: Az Const., Art.2, Sec.22 ; http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/const/2/22.htm
3)NH.Const.: https://www.nh.gov/glance/constitution.htm

B) COURT PROCEDURES:
1a) NH.Crim.Proc: https://www.courts.nh.gov/rules-supreme-court-state-new-hampshire
b) NH.Civ.Proc: https://www.courts.nh.gov/our-courts/supreme-court
c) NH.Appeal.Proc:
2a) Az.Crim.Proc: Az. Criminal procedure, rule 7.2 ; http://www.arizonacrimelaws.com/7_2.htm
b) Az.Civ.Proc:
c) Az.Appeal.Proc: https://casetext.com/rule/arizona-court-rules/arizona-superior-court-rules-of-appellate-procedure-criminal

Alright, so I am trying real quick to just confirm the quotes on the Law Basics doc, so here are the links to those…

>Az Const., Art.2, Sec.22 ; http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/const/2/22.htm
>Az. Criminal procedure, rule 7.2 ; http://www.arizonacrimelaws.com/7_2.htm
>California v. San Pablo & Tulare R. Co., 149 U.S. 308 (1893) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/149/308/case.html
>Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/468/737/case.html
>Tyler v. Judges of Court of Registration, 179 U.S. 405 (1900) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/179/405/case.html
>www.leagle.com/decision/1991680567NE2d113_1672/JORGENSEN v. STATE (Vonda Jorgensen, 567 N.E. 2d 113, 1991, Indiana Appeals Ct.)
>www.leagle.com/decision/19951131653NE2d478_11117/JOHNSON v. STATE (Andre Johnson, 653 N.E. 2d 478, 1995, Indiana Supreme Ct.)
>https://casetext.com/case/johnson-v-state-6598 (Larry Johnson, 785 N.E. 2d 1134, Ind. Ct. App. 2003)
>www.plainsite.org/dockets/1za0hymrv/indiana-supreme-court/jones-v-state/ (Morris Jones, 252 N.E. 2d 572, 1969; 253 Ind. 235, 1969, Indiana Supreme Ct.)
>Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/425/case.html
>Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137 137 (1803) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/case.html
>Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/269/385/case.html
> SEWELL v. GEORGIA. , 435 U.S. 982 (1978) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/435/982/case.html
>Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (1972) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/104/case.html
>Declaration of Independence http://usconstitution.net/declar.html
>US Constitution http://usconstitution.net/const.html
>18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
>18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242
>42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983
>42 U.S. Code § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985
>42 U.S. Code § 1986 – Action for neglect to prevent https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1986
>https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/civilrights/color_of_law
>www.thelawdictionary.org/color-of-law/
>Hartman v. Moore547 U.S. 250 (2006) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/250/opinion.html
>William Moore, Jr. v. Michael Hartman, No. 10-5334 (D.C. Cir. 2013) www.law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cadc/10-5334/10-5334-2013-01-15.html
>Ashcroft v. Iqbal556 U.S. 662 (2009) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/662/
>Pearson v. Callahan555 U.S. 223 (2009) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/555/223/opinion.html
>Brigham City v. Stuart547 U.S. 398 (2006) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/398/
>Burns v. Reed, No.500 U.S. 478 (1991) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/500/478/case.html
>Saucier v. Katz533 U.S. 194 (2001) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/533/194/
>http://openjurist.org/550/f2d/297/united-states-v-j-tweel ; United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nicholas J. Tweel, Defendant-appellant, 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit – 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977), April 8, 1977 ; http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/550/297/309366/
>Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 (1974) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/415/528/case.html
>Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/1/case.html
>MERRITT v. HUNTER, 1978 OK 18, 575 P.2d 623, Case Number: 51844. Decided: 02/14/1978. Supreme Court of Oklahoma www.law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/1978/47691.html
>Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 6 Wheat. 264 264 (1821) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/264/case.html
>18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
>18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2382
>https://casetext.com/case/huff-v-city-of-burbank-3 caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1552005.html
Joe Arpaio (Sheriff) cases: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Arpaio ; Phoenix New Times, LLC v. Arpaio, 177 P.3d 275 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2561780/phoenix-new-times-llc-v-arpaio/authorities/ ; http://frontera.psstudiosdev.com/doj-v-arpaio/ ; Phoenix New Times, LLC v. Arpaio, 177 P.3d 275 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) This opinion cites 0 opinions ; https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2561780/phoenix-new-times-llc-v-arpaio/authorities/
>United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 (1948) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/332/581/case.html
>Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 2 Dall. 419 419 (1793) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2/419/case.html
>Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/118/356/case.html
>Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 7 How. 1 1 (1849) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/48/1/case.html
>ARS 38-231. Officers and employees required to take loyalty oath; form; classification; definition www.azleg.gov/ars/38/00231.htm
>www.adversity.net/Terms_Definitions/TERMS/Nuremberg_Defense.htm
>Blacks Law define ‘driver’, ‘drive’… http://thelawdictionary.org/driver/ ; Blacks, 4th Ed: http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/docs/Books/Black’s%20Law%204th%20edition,%201891.pdf

Right to Travel cases…

> Davis v. Petrinovich, 112 Ala. 654 from Above Definition is cited here: https://casetext.com/case/hill-v-reaves
https://casetext.com/case/slusher-v-safety-coach-transit-co
>Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262 (1963) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/373/262/case.html
>https://casetext.com/case/chicago-coach-co-v-city-of-chicago ( Supreme Court of Illinois.·337 Ill. 200 (Ill. 1929)CHICAGO COACH CO. V. CITY OF CHICAGO)
>Thompson v. Smith, Chief of Police. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.155 Va. 367, 154 S.E. 579, 71 A.L.R. 604.Sept. 12, 1930. www.christianliberty.org/citings/va/thompson.html

RIGHT TO SOLICIT FOR DONATIONS FOR ONES SELF (‘PANHANDLE’)…

>http://caselaw.findlaw.com/az-court-of-appeals/1580052.html
>http://arizonastatelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/45-Ariz.-St.-L.J.-1227-2013.pdf
>http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0226p-06.pdf
>http://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FA-MI-0004-0004.pdf
>https://casetext.com/case/speet-v-schuette-2

TRESPASSING STATUTES IN ARIZONA:
>ARS 13-1501. Definitions www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/13/01501.htm
>ARS 13-1502. Criminal trespass in the third degree; classification www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/13/01502.htm&Title=13&DocType=ARS
>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)July 13, 1977 www.law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/557/1280/272817/
> Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc., 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977). An unrebutted affidavit stands as a fact in a court of law. This opinion cites 42 opinions: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/346927/data-disc-incorporated-v-systems-technology-associ/authorities/
>https://casetext.com/case/carmine-v-bowen
>United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Horton R. Prudden, Defendant-appellee, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970) www.law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/424/1021/385001/
>www.supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/default.htm (Cites Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932, 1906)
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_8 (Failure to Deny)
>https://govt.westlaw.com/azrules/Document/NC0B1E540717411DAA16E8D4AC7636430?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29 (Arizona Civil Procedure rule 8)
>28 U.S. Code § 1746 – Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1746
>http://thelawdictionary.org/state-n/
>http://www.dnb.com/
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1792
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1834
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Standard_Act (1900)
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1965
>https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79-Pg254.pdf
>28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions a https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 >

WOW thats a lot more than I thought. And I have most of these memorized after 6 years of this work! And that still is not all of them. These are just for this one doc.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

OTHER SITES WITH SOURCES OF AUTHORITY BY TOPIC / SUBJECT WE CAN COMBINE WITH THIS ONE:
Like for example, I remember “Cites By Topic” pages on Famguardian, and many others like that, which I’ve planned for years to combine when I reached this point:
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/rights.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/law.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/person.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/citizen.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/UnitedStates.htm

And some other links for this purpose I just found:
https://guides.law.stanford.edu/cases/tableofauthorities
https://legalofficeguru.com/table-of-authorities-ultimate-guide/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_authorities
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

USEFUL US CODES (some repeated from above):

18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242

18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 – RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
18 U.S. Code § 1962 – Prohibited activities
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1962
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-109-rico-charges

42 U.S. Code § 1981 – Equal rights under the law
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1981

42 U.S. Code § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983

42 U.S. Code § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985

42 U.S. Code § 1986 – Action for neglect to prevent
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1986

42 U.S. Code § 1988 – Proceedings in vindication of civil rights
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1988

_________________________________________________________________________________________
AND HERE ARE LINKS TO INSTRUCTIONS PAGES FOR NON-LAWYERS IN US AND STATE COURTS:
http://www.NRDL.org/howtosuegovt/ (<This is the main page I am working on all this for)
http://www.NRDL.org/notice_template/ (<This template HAS worked getting one suit filed so far)
http://www.NRDL.org/sources/ (<This page may replace this wordpress page when its all ready)
http://www.GovernPublicServants.com (<Here you can read and watch HOW I have learned o “GovernPublicServants” #LIKEaSOVEREIGN)

And a comment here where I was saving links to instructions for non-lawyers from multiple courts/sources here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-54

_______________________________________________________________

NOW, “HERE IS THE FIRST DRAFT OF THIS “NOTICE OF CLAIM OF DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW” TEMPLATE, so anyone can use this notice, and these “sources of authority by topic/subject” here on this WordPress page for now (to be moved to NRDL.org soon)…”:
https://www.nrdl.org/notice_template/
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/ (Get these “LawDocs” here free)
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/NOTICE OF CLAIM, of Deprivations of Rights-For_Basic_Template.pdf
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/NOTICE OF CLAIM, of Deprivations of Rights-For_Basic_Template.odt
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-2/#comment-145
_______________________________________________________________

MORE USEFUL FILES FOR DEFENDING LAWFUL RIGHTS:

I am making this WordPress page just to share files like this pdf of this case below (Retzlaff-lawsuit.pdf) which a friend shared with me, which seems a good example of how to defend our rights, using a common law jury to point out how the Court Systems are violating Due process of Constitutional Law, how to put Public Servants on Notice of exactly what the “Law of the Land” requires of them, and the consequences if they do “any Thing… to the Contrary”… AND I PLAN TO USE THIS PAGE TO SHARE A LOT MORE USEFUL LEGAL REFERENCES, CASES, LAWS, OTHER WEBSITES Like My Own), here…

Like…
http://www.NRDL.org/sources/
…where I plan to organize these “sources of authority” I am putting together right now here:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/
…and…
http://www.GovernPublicServants.com
http://www.HowWeExist.com “

FROM HERE:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/12/20/useful-files-for-defending-lawful-rights/
_______________________________________________________________

And here is where to file criminal complaints with the US Courts and Dept. of Justice:
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/law-enforcement-grand-jury-and-prosecution-forms/criminal-complaint
https://www.justice.gov/crt/filing-complaint
https://www.justice.gov/actioncenter/submit-complaint
https://www.justice.gov/criminal
https://civilrights.justice.gov/

_______________________________________________________________

HERE IS THE EMAIL I USED TO GET MY LAST TICKET DISMISSED WITHOUT GOING TO COURT:
(and the courts response, to dismiss FIRST thing next morning!)..
“I JUST GOT ANOTHER CASE DISMISSED! THAT MAKES 7+ NOW! …”:
https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10214351360337989

Here is the talk I had with Tempe Police internal affairs in 2020 where I explained these “fundamental principles” of “the supreme Law of the Land” and “the common law” to clearly (between 1-5minutes):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zUcdrEO8uQtS/

Here is the last time Tempe Police stopped me for no bike light or many other harmless “offenses” back in 2016 where I explained how I would prosecute THEM for “deprivation of rights under color of law” including “neglect to prevent” now that they “reasonably should know” they act “to the Contrary” of these “fundamental principles” of “the supreme Law of the Land” which we both swore to “support and defend, against all enemies, foreign and domestic”! And THEY tell me “thats over 90% of what we do” that is clearly not enforceable after seeing this one “LawDoc” “For Police Encounters!” Here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ASbOmQL4jJd/

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

… STILL NEED TO ADD:

Add Rules of Evidence, hearsay not admissible, etc., along with affidavits fact if not disputed… Levels of standards of proof and where each applies (preponderance, clear and convincing, beyond reasonable doubt)…
Three jurisdictions of courts and requirements: Criminal, Civil Tort (injury, not criminal) and other Civil Disputes (Contract, Probate, etc., dispute arbitration only).… Add exigent circumstances cites for warrantless arrests… Add Grounds for arrest warrants, and exceptions… THESE QUOTES ARE NOT ALL VERIFIED YET…. WORK IN PROGRESS… Probable Cause to arrest vs reasonable suspicion to stop and question, and Terry Search requirements (Reasonable Suspicion of crime and possession of firearm to pat down for weapons and hold them. See US Supreme Court: Az. V. Serna www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10204087901597935:25) … Add Right to privacy limits, ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’, ‘The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects’. … Add HTML links to sources for everything, on a separate page, with #’d references, and encode them as clickable links in this .docx document. … Add types of bond, secured, unsecured, cash only, and how you can do a ‘promise to pay’/’promissory note’ (Refer to examples for this, to be done in the future), instead of going to a bondsman, and make a contract to give collateral to the promisor if you fail to appear and the promise comes due. Otherwise if you show up it costs no one anything but the time and effort. … Suits against States (11^th Amend., Art.2, Sec.18 Az Const)

[“it is a court’s obligation to dismiss a case whenever it becomes convinced that it has no proper jurisdiction, no matter how late that wisdom may arrive. See Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 12(h)(3) (“Whenever it appears … that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action”) (emphasis added). See also Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U. S. 411, 421 (1969).” [Wyoming v. Oklahoma 502 U.S. 437 (1992) ” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/502/437/case.html ]

… STILL TO ADD: Add Rules of Evidence, hearsay not admissible, etc., along with affidavits fact if not disputed… Levels of standards of proof and where each applies (preponderance, clear and convincing, beyond reasonable doubt)…
Three areas of jurisdiction of courts and 3 requirements: Areas…Criminal, Civil Tort (injury, not criminal) and other Civil Disputes (Contract, Probate, etc., dispute arbitration only).… Requirements to prove are Personal (Do you have consent of all parties or a legit claim that one harmed/endangered another –corpus delicti?), Territorial (Correct Court where crime was committed under whose laws were violated?) and Subject Matter (Is this court authorized to hear this type of issue?). Along with three elements to a crime (Corpus Delicti, Mens Rea, and Actus Reus)…

Add exigent circumstances cites for warrantless arrests… Add Grounds for arrest warrants, and exceptions… THESE QUOTES ARE NOT ALL VERIFIED YET…. WORK IN PROGRESS… Probable Cause to arrest vs reasonable suspicion to stop and question, and Terry Search requirements (Reasonable Suspicion of crime and possession of firearm to pat down for weapons and hold them. See US Supreme Court: Az. V. Serna www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10204087901597935:25) … Add Right to privacy limits, ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’, ‘The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects’. … Add HTML links to sources for everything, on a separate page, with #’d references, and encode them as clickable links in this .docx document. … Add types of bond, secured, unsecured, cash only, and how you can do a ‘promise to pay’/’promissory note’ (Refer to examples for this, to be done in the future), instead of going to a bondsman, and make a contract to give collateral to the promisor if you fail to appear and the promise comes due. Otherwise if you show up it costs no one anything but the time and effort. … Suits against States (11^th Amend., Art.2, Sec.18 Az Const)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Still to Add:
Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide any question which occurs in the cause, and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgments, until reversed, are regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and form no bar to a remedy sought in opposition to them, even prior to a reversal. They constitute no justification, and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences are considered in law as trespassers.
Elliott v. Lessee of Piersol, 26 U.S. 1 Pet. 328 328 (1828)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/26/328/case.html

It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 6 Wheat. 264 264 (1821)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/264/case.html

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“These last few things on that site look promising…

“…

Identify And Publicly Expose Biased, Prejudiced And Corrupt Judges!

Early identification of a Bad Judge may be the single most important factor in your litigation. Once one notices a Judge is bad, you can practically guarantee it is only going to get worse. If it is too late to help in your own case, exposure helps prevent similar judicial abuse for subsequent litigants. Consider publicity, picketing and formal complaints like this info from Alaska Judicial Commission and these examples: Gembala Complaint, Caught.net and see this report on the Judicial Disciplinary Process. Judicial Disciplinary Process

Impeachment, Recall

See Petition For Impeachment

Legislative & Citizen Action To Limit Judicial Power And Discretion

See Jail4Judges

Suing A Judge Personally For Money Damages

Overcoming Judicial Immunity and Judicial Immunity Case Law

Federal 42 USC 1983 Civil Rights Lawsuits

** NEW ** Mitchell v. City of Henderson. See the Sample Title 42 Suit and the Instructions For Title 42 Suit

Suing A Judge For A Declaratory Judgment

See Article

…”

http://caught.net/prose/immunity.htm

caught.net/prose/suejcase.htm

“

https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10205074513182608?comment_id=10205075797694720&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D

https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/pfbid029HbMUtnumzuo4qf1fmFzVA4TUGowoy4UKB3KgUW4M4UYFHjSxpv7uLJ1wEyCdtqhl?ref=embed_post
————————————————–
————————————————–

“And I’ll need some cases to cite when I use the quote ‘make a reasonable and prudent person believe’…

http://law.justia.com/…/supreme-court/1968/8832-pr-0.html

law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/1963/6763-0.html

law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supreme-court/1963/7035-0.html

…”

https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10205074233695621?comment_id=10205074491462065&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D

https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/pfbid02Rj77K9k5XiPFx3f4VogDaZatqCPhV8c1aRW7Byu1MsiJ2KsJtDF2ZNk34E8YQWynl?ref=embed_post
————————————————–
————————————————–
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES” TO JUSTIFY “SEARCHES AND SEIZURES” WITHOUT A “WARRANT”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-64

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

And some relevant US Court rules referenced for the purpose of filing civil complaints like rule 8 for ‘failure to deny’ amounts to admission of guilt in non-criminal cases:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-65

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A FB POST WITH LINKS TO INFO ON “CIVIL ARREST ORDERS/WARRANTS”, WHICH ACCORDING TO THE 4TH AND 6TH AND 14TH AMENDMENTS AND US SUPREME COURT CASES ON “PROBABLE CAUSE” AND THREE “ELEMENTS” TO A “CRIME” CANNOT POSSIBLY BE “LAWFUL”!:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-59

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“EXAMPLE LAWSUITS, FROM PROFESSIONAL LAW FIRMS (Preferably SUCCESSFUL ones here)”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-60

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“AN ISSUE I NEED TO FIX, HOW MY LOCAL POLICE (AND THE US COURTS) ARE NOT TAKING PROPER CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS SIGNED “UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY”…”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-61

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“SOME EXAMPLES OF MY SUCCESS SO FAR”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-62
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“Regarding rights to “Discovery” of evidence against you (In Az)”:
https://www.arizonacrimelaws.com/15_1.htm/

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-is-a-supplemental-notice-of-disclosure–884170.html

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“And I’ll share here a link to the US and some State Constitutions I’m using”:
https://usconstitution.net/const.html
https://www.azleg.gov/constitution/
https://www.nh.gov/glance/constitution.htm
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LINKS TO OTHER WEBPAGES WORKING ON DEFENDING OUR LIBERTIES, WHICH I/WE SHOULD ALL TRY TO WORK TOGETHER WITH:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-67

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not sure where to put this one yet:
“…The text of the law appearing in the Statutes at Large prevails over the text of the law appearing in a non-positive law title.”…
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-68

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“LINKS TO OTHER FORMS, FOR BLANK MOTIONS, CIVIL SUITS, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS, ETC., IN US AND STATE COURTS”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-69

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Info on taking the Bar exam, unlicensed practice of law (a deprivation of rights under color of law btw):
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-70

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society” -JFK
https://www.lockhaven.com/opinion/columns/2015/07/the-very-word-secrecy-is-repugnant-in-a-free-and-open-society/

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IF THE JUDGE AND/OR PROSECUTOR REFUSE TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES WHEN THERE IS “probable cause”, “We the People” can hold “Citizens Grand Juries”:
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-78

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We can all share and help find and organize the best sources for making legal documents here on this WordPress page. I am told WordPress is ‘open source’ (meaning the code can be read by anyone, see how it works) and it stores files on your/my host server so other people cannot delete or censor posts like Facebook and Youtube and other sites do (Like Disquss I’m using now for comments on my webpages, but I plan to change this).

So you can also use WordPress as an efficient way to take large amounts of text and convert it into basic html pretty easily, then copy that code and use it to build your own webpages, which I’m in the process of doing now.

Here are the main three “LawDocs” I carry with the main “fundamental principles” of law in them which I want to combine with more sources of authority from the links below for the “fundamental_principles” page and “notice of claim…” pages:
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/LawDoc.2_’THE%20LAW’%20FOR%20POLICE%20ENCOUNTERS_(2.27.2022_.pdf%20file%20for%20printing).pdf
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/LawDoc.3_’JUSTICE SYSTEM’, BASIC RULES, ‘FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES’-(5.20.2020_2pg PDF for Printing).pdf
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/LawDoc.4_NOTICE OF CLAIM OF DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, AND FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW (4th draft, for printing, pgs-1,2).pdf
FROM HERE:
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/

So here is the page where I am putting these “sources of authority” and a basic summary of these “fundamental principles” of “the common law” and “the supreme Law of the Land” here in the USA, for us all to use to make legal documents in the future:
www.nrdl.org/fundamental_principles.html

And here is the page where I’m working on this notice of claim template for, to use with all types of court motions and writs and civil and criminal complaints and commercial liens and so on:
www.NRDL.org/howtosuegovt/

…

SO THE GOAL HERE IS TO GET EVERYONE TO WORK TOGETHER TO SHARE AND ORGANIZE THE BEST SOURCES OF AUTHORITY FOR EVERY TOPIC, AND GIVE THEM AWAY FREE TO EVERYONE, SO ALL OF US CAN ALL ACTUALLY “establish Justice… and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” FINALLY!

Which I HAVE managed to do with my local police and courts as you can see here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqtfMDnhXaE (This is how I also made sure police and sheriffs wont enforce recent ‘mandates’)
And here (They stopped enforcing this and a LOT of things since this!):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4SZvDLiOw0
And here:
“Here is the last case I got dismissed for myself, the message I sent the court, and their response (to dismiss and close case):
https://www.facebook.com/harleyborgais/posts/10214351360337989 “

…

And more to come here:
www.GovernPublicServants.com (read how I’ve learned to “Govern Public Servants” here and get links to all this and more as I build it all up).

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Here is a post I made on Facebook regarding: “…the fundamental principles of why government and Society become corrupt, because absolute power corrupts absolutely, or in other words excessive power inevitably will corrupt anyone.

So because of that it’s actually “We the People” who ALLOW too much “Authority” and wealth/resources for our hired “Public Servants”, because too many people think and act like their “Government” should take care of them and they depend on “Government” to tell them what to think and do too much, instead of learning these “fundamental principles” of “Law” and actually holding our HIRED “PUBLIC SERVANTS” accountable whenever they violate their actual “duty” to:

“establish Justice… and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”!

So it’s because of Sloth, Greed, Wrath, Lust, Envy, Hubris (not just pride which can be healthy if balanced with Humility, modesty), and Cowardice (instead of gluttony in the standard “seven deadly sins” which I think were close but this is more accurate), which are the “fundamental” CAUSES of corruption in Human Society FIRST, in our “Culture” (beliefs and resulting practices of a group of people), and in “Government” as a result of that, and then the main (7) international industries (i.e. the 7 “horns of the beast” along with 3 “branches of Government”) as a result of “Government” not fulfilling its purpose (allowing our enemies to “Govern” OUR “Government” like right now!)… again, because too many people DEPEND on “Government” and not enough actually “Govern Public Servants”, which is why my purpose in life now is to improve these problems in society by SHOWING everyone how to PROFIT from learning to PROSECUTE OUR “Government” for “any Thing… to the Contrary” of these “fundamental principles” of “the common law” and OUR “supreme Law of the Land” here in the USA!

And FYI I do believe ^THIS^ is what God is trying to teach us through “analogy” in “Revelations” in the Bible!”
FROM HERE: https://www.facebook.com/01bassmaster/posts/2168258486655189?comment_id=2169100576570980

NOW I HAVE FOUND COPIES OF THINGS LIKE THE SATANIC BIBLE, and oaths of secret societies that worship Lucifer, it seems like all his secrets are being revealed through the internet now! One thing I noticed, is in Chapter 1 of the Satanic Bible it ENCOURAGES people to “indulge” in the Classic “Seven Deadly Sins” (I always thought so, “Know them by their fruits” the Bible tells us, and I have always seen signs of this, but now I have the actual proofs!), here, along with other “evidence of crimes against Humanity” I have found evidence against “the worst crime against Humanity in history” being this “Covid-19” “Plandemic”!):
https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/05/28/evidence-of-crimes-against-humanity/#comment-489

As I posted there, “the satanic bible” says: “THE SEVEN deadly sins of the Christian Church are: greed, pride, envy, anger, gluttony, lust, and sloth. Satanism advocates indulging in each of these “sins” as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification.” I thought so. You can see it in the effects they cause, people who believe this way! Jesus showed us a much better example though, here is when He was being tested, tempted by the Devil and so on:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%209&version=NKJV
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
(This Comment with Links to Each Topic or Subject of Law is showing preview images of this same page instead of links to the comments here, so that is not working well, so I’m changing it now, see below): https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-3/#comment-461

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

HERE IS A TABLE OF CONTENTS WITH LINKS TO EACH SUBJECT/ TOPIC:

https://freeornottobe.wordpress.com/2022/03/13/sources-of-authority-by-topic-subject-of-law/comment-page-4/#comment-511

…OK HERE IS THE END OF THIS ‘POST’, AND THE START OF THE ‘COMMENTS’ BELOW…
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

411 thoughts on ““SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW:”

harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 714), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #714…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:19 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 715), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #715…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:20 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 716), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #716…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:21 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 717), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #717…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:21 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 718), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #718…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:21 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 719), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #719…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 720), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #720…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

721

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

722

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

723

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

724

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:22 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

725

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:23 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

726

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:24 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

727

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:24 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

728

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:24 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

729

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:24 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

[This comment is here to make space, to reach comment #700 (this should be 730), so I can start re-numbering and moving content from these 40+ “sources of authority” to comments that are in order better than the current mixed up mess! So for this one I plan to edit and change this into the Definitions starting at comment 701…]
_______________________________________________
SO HERE WE CAN PUT ‘DEFINITIONS’ WHICH CONTINUE HERE AT COMMENT #730…
_______________________________________________

LikeLike

March 4, 2024 at 11:24 pm Reply
Pingback: “SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW (revised): | freeornottobe
harleyborgais says:

THIS SITE IS VERY CLOSE TO WHAT I AM TRYING TO BUILD HERE (on http://www.NRDL.org/sources/ by subject/topic):
https://famguardian.org/
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/Freedom/Freedom.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/citizen.htm
https://famguardian.org/TaxFreedom/CitesByTopic/corporation.htm

LikeLike

March 9, 2024 at 12:12 am Reply
harleyborgais says:

I WILL NEED TO RE-ORGANIZE THESE ‘SOURCES OF AUTHORITY’ PROBABLY, maybe move elsewhere, since I am putting sources by topic in order in comments 601-640+ now…

“Protection codes

18 USC 242- Color Of Law, personal capacity Rights deprivation.

42 USC 1983- Color Of Law, official capacity

Rights deprivation.

42 USC 1994- Peonage is abolished.

(Employer forcing one to labor to pay a debt under threat of incarceration).

The 14th amendment prohibits state interference with both parents rights to direct the care, custody, and well being of their human offspring.

18 USC 1593 (a)- Benefitting financially from, peonage, slavery, and human trafficking is a crime.

18 USC 1592- Destruction of documentation and or evidence in regards to peonage is a crime.

18 USC 1590- Human trafficking in regards to slavery and peonage is also a crime.

18 USC 227- wrongfully influencing a private entities employment decisions.

18 USC 208- personal financial interest in proceedings by officials.

18 USC 201- bribery of a public official is a crime, see definition of bribery, see recusal.

28 USC 1737- officer’s bonds must be provided when asked for by superiors. This confirms all public officials are bonded and thus have an oath and code of conduct and is evidenced here.

28 USC 351- court of appeals clerk must accept a valid statement brief of misconduct.

42 USC 603- There must be a consideration of ability to pay in child support cases. (They dont want to openly violate the 13th amendment). There must be a commitment to cooperate (when did i say here you can have half my property, assets, and reserve notes?) There must be A commitment to work(peonage),(unconstitutional, see 13th amendment), a description of services(what services? That was kept secret) and commitment to seek better employment and increase earnings so they can take more.

15 USC 1692 (e)- False and misleading representations by debt collectors is a crime.

SSA act, Title IV-D cases are based on contracts, debt, fraud, duress, coercion, and peonage.

42 USC 666- these support contracts require full disclosure and due process.

31 USC 103- Executive agency means executive branch. Judges are not supposed to be in these cases, it is a violation of the seperation Of Powers for an executive agency to operate in a judicial capacity or a judge to hear an administrative hearing.

45 CFR 302.34- Every official involved in support enforcement gets a financial interest to violate your rights and ignore you. Under cooperative arrangements which are actually bribes and financial incentives laid against the people.

§§§§§

31 USC 1720D- wage garnishment may only be issued in the case of a non tax debt.

26 USC 7345- passport may be denied for taxable debt.

So is child support a tax or non tax debt?

It is a non tax debt. So they cant actually take your passport. If they do report them to the irs.

§§§§§§”
FROM HERE:
https://www.facebook.com/1039035490/posts/10230158661404047/

LikeLike

March 14, 2024 at 9:49 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

“GENERAL FAMILY RIGHTS CASE LAWS

Blackburn v. Alabama 361 U.S. 199, 206 (1960)
Coercion can be mental as well as physical.
Brokaw v. Mercer County (7th Cir. 2000)
Children have standing to sue for their removal after they reach the age of majority. Children have a constitutional right to live with their parents without government interference. — Just the highlights
Cassady v. Tackett
Coercive or intimidating behavior supports a reasonable belief that compliance is compelled.
Florida v. Bostick (S. Ct. 1991)
“Consent” that is the product of official intimidation or harassment is not consent at all. Citizens do not forfeit their constitutional rights when they are coerced to comply with a request that they would prefer to refuse.
J.B. v. Washington County (10th Cir. 1997)
The forced separation of parent from child, even for a short time (in this case 18 hours), represents a serious infringement upon the rights of both.
K.H. through Murphy v. Morgan (7th Cir. 1990)
State employee who withhold a child from their family may infringe on the family’s liberty of familial association. Social workers could not deliberately remove children from their parents and place them with foster caregivers when the officials reasonably should have known such an action would cause harm to the child’s mental or physical health.
Malik v. Arapahoe Cty. Department of Social Services (10th Cir. 1999)
Absent extraordinary circumstances, a parent has a liberty interest in familial association and privacy that cannot be violated without adequate pre-deprivation procedures.
North Hudson DYFS v. Koehler Family (2001)
The court explained “absent some tangible evidence of abuse or neglect, the Courts do not authorize fishing expeditions into citizens’ houses. Mere parroting of the phrase “best interest of the child” without supporting facts and a legal basis is insufficient to support a Court order based on reasonableness or any other ground.”
Thomason v. Scan Volunteer Services, Inc. (8th Cir. 1996)
Parent interest is of “the highest order,” and the court recognizes “the vital importance of curbing overzealous suspicion and intervention on the part of health care professionals and government officials.”
Troxel v. Granville (2002)
The state may not interfere in child rearing decisions when a fit parent is available. – Just the highlights. 530 U.S. 57
Valmonte v. Bane (2nd Cir. 1993) Decided March 03, 1994
A Central Register that identifies individuals accused of child abuse and neglect and the communication of those names to potential employers in the child care field, implicates a protectible liberty interest under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Appellant alleged the inclusion of her name on the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment violated her right of due process. On appeal, court ruled that the appellant’s right of due process was violated because it was found that she did have a liberty interest which was imperiled by the procedures.
The court noted that the procedures, which permitted inclusion on the Register by virtue of “some credible evidence” of abuse, created a high risk of error.
In a similiar case Paul v. Davis, the court ruled that damage to one’s reputation is not “by itself sufficient to invoke the procedural protection of the Due Process Clause. Rather, the Court held, loss of reputation must be coupled with some other tangible element in order to rise to the level of a protectible liberty interest. This has been interpreted to mean that “stigma plus” is required to establish a constitutional deprivation.
Ward v. San Jose (9th Cir. 1992)
A child has a constitutionally protected interest in the companionship and society of his or her parent.
Weller v. Department of Social Services for Baltimore (4th Cir. 1990)
The private, fundamental liberty interest involved in retaining custody of one’s child and the integrity of one’s family is of the greatest importance.
Whisman v. Rinehart (8th Cir. 1997)
Parents and child had a clearly established liberty interest in associating together. This right was violated where the defendants allegedly had no indication of any physical neglect of the child, no indication of any immediate threat to his welfare, and no indication of any criminal activity by his mother, where they had only third-hand hearsay that the child’s mother had gotten drunk and failed to pick up the child from his babysitter, and where defendants refused to return the child, had not investigated to determine whether it was necessary to remove the child in the first place, and had not investigated the possibility of returning the child to his mother, grandmother, or anyone designated by the mother.”
FROM HERE:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/415083733546409/posts/953406396380804/

LikeLike

March 17, 2024 at 7:50 pm Reply
harleyborgais says:

CASES REGARDING RIGHT TO RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST:
_____________________________________________________________
John Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/177/529/

Plummer v. State, 485 N.E.2d 1367 (1985)
https://law.justia.com/…/supreme-court/1985/584s196-2.html

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.”
https://www.facebook.com/1181176577/posts/10232818338059039/?rdid=itH4Ya2calw1zNOK
_____________________________________________________________
See: US v. DiRe on our “undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest”, and “the supreme Law” on how ALL “searches and seizures” and “In all criminal prosecutions” there must be “probable” evidence of an actual “crime” against another equal individual Human right, caused by intent or inexcusable neglect of the accused suspect, and in violation of valid criminal law of the land, otherwise there must be some contractual obligation, or one must be in some way exercising a “privilege” (as opposed to a “right”) or in some way violating another Human right for courts to have “Jurisdiction” over them against their will. Otherwise courts may only entertain or hear cases where the opposing parties agree to let the court do so to help them settle their dispute(s).
https://www.nrdl.org/lawdocs/LawDoc.2_'THE%20LAW'%20FOR%20POLICE%20ENCOUNTERS_(2.27.2022_.pdf%20file%20for%20printing).pdf

LikeLike

May 2, 2024 at 11:27 pm Reply

freeornottobe

Unifying theories, God, Free Energy, Cause & Cure for all disease, Law & Govt. corruption and remedies.

“SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW:

411 thoughts on ““SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW:”

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Share this:

Related

411 thoughts on ““SOURCES OF AUTHORITY” BY TOPIC / SUBJECT OF LAW:”

Leave a comment Cancel reply